Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on an Apple M3 Ultra (512GB)
Yes — the unquantized weights fit with room for 128k tokens of context.
Verdict
Fits at FP16
384.0 GiB usable of 512 GB
Weights (Q4_K_M)
39.6 GiB
131.4 GiB at FP16 · 70.6B params · 6 of 6 quant rows are measured files
KV cache
320.0 KiB per token at FP16
80 layers × 8 KV heads × 128 dimensions
Speed ceiling
6 tok/s
819 GB/s ÷ bytes read per token
Every quant, against this card
Weight bytes are the size of the real published file wherever one exists — 6 of these6 rows are measured from bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct-GGUF, the rest computed from the parameter count. Max context is what the KV cache can grow to in whatever memory the weights leave behind, capped at the 128k tokens this model was trained to address.
| Precision | Bits/weight | Weights | Source | Fits | Max context | Ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP16 / BF16 | 16.00 | 131.4 GiB | measured file | yes | 131,072 (model cap) | 6 tok/s |
| Q8_0 | 8.50 | 69.8 GiB | measured file | yes | 131,072 (model cap) | 11 tok/s |
| Q6_K | 6.56 | 53.9 GiB | measured file | yes | 131,072 (model cap) | 14 tok/s |
| Q5_K_M | 5.66 | 46.5 GiB | measured file | yes | 131,072 (model cap) | 16 tok/s |
| Q4_K_M | 4.82 | 39.6 GiB | measured file | yes | 131,072 (model cap) | 18 tok/s |
| Q3_K_M | 3.89 | 31.9 GiB | measured file | yes | 131,072 (model cap) | 22 tok/s |
What the context actually costs
The KV cache is 2 · layers · kv_heads · head_dim bytes per token per element — 2 · 80 · 8 · 128 · 2 B = 320.0 KiB. It depends on the key/value head count, not the attention-head count and not the parameter count. This model shares 8 KV heads across 64 query heads, which divides the cache by 8 against multi-head attention.
| Context | KV cache (FP16) | KV cache (8-bit) | Plus Q4_K_M weights |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4,096 | 1.3 GiB | 640 MiB | 40.9 GiB |
| 8,192 | 2.5 GiB | 1.3 GiB | 42.1 GiB |
| 32,768 | 10.0 GiB | 5.0 GiB | 49.6 GiB |
| 131,072 | 40.0 GiB | 20.0 GiB | 79.6 GiB |
The speed ceiling, and where it comes from
Generating one token reads every active weight from memory once. At FP16 / BF16 that is 131.4 GiB, plus a pass over the KV cache. An Apple M3 Ultra (512GB) moves 819 GB/s, so the arithmetic ceiling is 6 tok/s. Treat it as a bound, not an estimate: attention overhead, kernel launches and imperfect memory access keep real runtimes at roughly 60–80% of it, and nothing pushes past it.
Where these numbers come from
The model
- Parameters
- 70,553,706,496
- Layers
- 80
- Attention / KV heads
- 64 / 8
- Head dimension
- 128
- Trained context
- 131,072
- Checkpoint as published
- 131.4 GiB
Read from unsloth/Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct — an ungated mirror of meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, whose own config cannot be fetched without an access token. The parameter count is the Hub's own total over the tensor shapes, not a figure taken from the model's name.
The accelerator
- Memory
- 512 GB LPDDR5 unified
- Bandwidth
- 819 GB/s
- Assumed usable
- 75% → 384.0 GiB
Capacity and bandwidth from the vendor's specification. The usable fraction is an assumption, not a spec: unified memory is shared with the OS and the display, and the GPU working-set cap is raisable on Apple silicon with `sudo sysctl iogpu.wired_limit_mb`.
Questions this pairing answers
How much VRAM does Llama 3.1 70B Instruct need?
131.4 GiB for the weights at FP16 — 70.6B parameters at two bytes each — and 39.6 GiB at Q4_K_M. The KV cache is on top of that and is not a fixed number: this model spends 320.0 KiB per token of context, so 8,192 tokens costs a further 2.5 GiB. An Apple M3 Ultra (512GB) makes 384.0 GiB of its 512 GB available on the assumption below.
Can an Apple M3 Ultra (512GB) run Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
Yes — the unquantized weights fit with room for 128k tokens of context. That is the weights and the KV cache together, against 384.0 GiB of usable memory.
How fast will Llama 3.1 70B Instruct run on an Apple M3 Ultra (512GB)?
No faster than 6 tokens/second at FP16 / BF16, and in practice below it. Decoding is memory-bound: every token reads all 131.4 GiB of weights plus the cache, and this card moves 819 GB/s. That division is the ceiling — no kernel, runtime or driver beats it, and a real runtime typically reaches 60–80% of it.
Why does the context length change how much memory Llama 3.1 70B Instruct needs?
Because the KV cache holds one key and one value vector per token, per layer, for the whole conversation, and it is allocated separately from the weights. This model has 80 layers and 8 key/value heads of 128 dimensions, shared across 64 query heads — grouped-query attention, which divides the cache by 8. That works out at 320.0 KiB per token. Parameter count tells you nothing about this number.
The same model on a different card
- H200 141GB (SXM)Q8_0
- Apple M4 Max (128GB)Q8_0
- A100 80GB (SXM)Q8_0
- H100 80GB (SXM5)Q8_0
- Jetson AGX Orin (64GB)Q5_K_M
- RTX 6000 Ada GenerationQ4_K_M
- L40SQ4_K_M
- Apple M4 Pro (48GB)Q3_K_M
A different model on the same card
All 62 models on Apple M3 Ultra (512GB) →- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70BFP16 / BF16
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructFP16 / BF16
- Llama 3.3 70B InstructFP16 / BF16
- Qwen2.5 72B InstructFP16 / BF16
- Mixtral 8x7B InstructFP16 / BF16
- Hermes 4.3 36BFP16 / BF16
- KAT Coder V2.5 DevFP16 / BF16
- Qwen AgentWorld 35B A3BFP16 / BF16
Method and limits. Weight bytes are the byte size of the real published file wherever one exists, and the model's exact parameter count times the published llama.cpp bits-per-weight where it does not. That distinction is on every row above and it matters at both ends: a sub-1B model's Q4_K_M file runs a third larger than the nominal figure because k-quants keep its embedding tables at higher precision, and an already-4-bit release cannot be quantized upward at all. The KV cache is 2 · layers · kv_heads · head_dim · bytes per token, summed over layers with each sliding-window layer capped at its window. The speed figure is a roofline bound, not a benchmark: bandwidth divided by bytes read per token, which no runtime exceeds and every runtime falls short of. The usable fraction of card memory is an assumption: 75% here, which is what this lane assumes for unified memory, where the OS and window server share the same pool — the other class assumes 92%, so it is not one number applied to every device. That is the only assumed input on this page; every other figure is computed from the model config and the card's published specification. Nothing on this page is written by a language model. Architecture from the model's published config, fetched 2026-08-07.