3.15 kHz high shelf
Lifts or drops everything above f0 by a fixed amount and leaves the bottom flat. Solved at 8 sample rates, with the poles, the real −3 dB point and the word length it stops working at.
Magnitude response at 48 kHz
Every vertex is 20·log₁₀|H(ejω)| evaluated on the unit circle — not a sketch of the filter's shape. Shelves fix the slope at S = 1, so there is no Q family to draw; the faint traces are the gain sweep.
Gain at f0 (3.15 kHz)
+3.00 dB
exact at every sample rate — the bilinear transform maps this value, not just the frequency
Pole radius at 48 kHz
0.7089119
conjugate pair at ±20.54°, 0.291 from the circle
−3 dB point
3144.5 Hz
0.998× f0 at Q = 0.7071
16-bit fixed point
holds
largest pole 0.7089171 in Q2.13
Coefficients, at every sample rate
The cookbook computes w₀ = 2πf₀/Fs, so the same filter is a different set of numbers at every rate. Rates whose Nyquist limit is at or below 3.15 kHz are absent because the filter does not exist there — equivalently, the f₀/Nyquist column never reaches 100%. That is why this table is 8 rows and a 20 Hz page is 8.
| Sample rate | b0 | b1 | b2 | a1 | a2 | Pole r | f₀/Nyquist |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 kHz | 1.170222 | 1.108516 | 0.391925 | 1.221655 | 0.449008 | 0.670081 | 78.8% |
| 16 kHz | 1.511321 | -0.879195 | 0.350693 | -0.195520 | 0.178339 | 0.422302 | 39.4% |
| 22.1 kHz | 1.621980 | -1.560751 | 0.551938 | -0.629300 | 0.242468 | 0.492411 | 28.6% |
| 32 kHz | 1.723766 | -2.202068 | 0.821373 | -1.018084 | 0.361155 | 0.600961 | 19.7% |
| 44.1 kHz | 1.791594 | -2.637460 | 1.047858 | -1.271484 | 0.473475 | 0.688095 | 14.3% |
| 48 kHz | 1.806818 | -2.736116 | 1.104159 | -1.327695 | 0.502556 | 0.708912 | 13.1% |
| 96 kHz | 1.897391 | -3.330787 | 1.484252 | -1.656664 | 0.707520 | 0.841142 | 6.6% |
| 192 kHz | 1.945496 | -3.652569 | 1.720862 | -1.827182 | 0.840971 | 0.917045 | 3.3% |
const float b0 = 1.80681770f, b1 = -2.73611606f, b2 = 1.10415949f;
const float a1 = -1.32769496f, a2 = 0.50255609f; // a0 == 1What word length this filter survives
The fixed-point rows round all five coefficients to one shared scale, which is what a q15/q31 biquad section does with its post-shift.Pole radius is solved from the quadratic, not taken as √|a₂| — once rounding pushes the poles onto the real axis those two disagree, and the convenient one reports a comfortable margin on a filter that has already left the unit circle. Error is the worst deviation from float64 across frequencies where the response is within 40 dB of its own peak; below that it is measuring the −200 dB floor.
| Word format | Q format | Largest pole | √|a₂| says | Stable | Worst error in band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| float64 | — | 0.7089119 | 0.7089119 | yes | reference |
| float32 | — | 0.7089119 | 0.7089119 | yes | 0.0000 dB |
| 32-bit fixed | Q2.29 | 0.7089119 | 0.7089119 | yes | 0.0000 dB |
| 24-bit fixed | Q2.21 | 0.7089121 | 0.7089121 | yes | 0.0000 dB |
| 16-bit fixed | Q2.13 | 0.7089171 | 0.7089171 | yes | 0.0061 dB |
What gain does at 3.15 kHz
A shelf reaches half its dB gain at f₀ — exactly half, at every sample rate — and its full gain on the far side.
| Gain | At f₀ | b0 | a1 | a2 | Pole r |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -12 dB | −6.00 dB | 0.307033 | -1.588682 | 0.659895 | 0.812340 |
| -6 dB | −3.00 dB | 0.553459 | -1.514329 | 0.611107 | 0.781734 |
| -3 dB | −1.50 dB | 0.743840 | -1.472666 | 0.585201 | 0.764984 |
| +3 dB | +1.50 dB | 1.344376 | -1.379510 | 0.530800 | 0.728560 |
| +6 dB | +3.00 dB | 1.806818 | -1.327695 | 0.502556 | 0.708912 |
| +12 dB | +6.00 dB | 3.256981 | -1.212887 | 0.444828 | 0.666954 |
Questions this filter answers
What are the biquad coefficients for a 3.15 kHz high-shelf filter at 48 kHz?
b0 = 1.806818, b1 = -2.736116, b2 = 1.104159, a1 = -1.327695, a2 = 0.502556, with a0 normalised to 1 — the RBJ Audio EQ Cookbook form at Q = 0.7071 and +6 dB of gain. Every other sample rate in the table above gives different numbers for the same filter, because w0 = 2πf0/Fs and every cosine and sine downstream of it moves.
Is a 3.15 kHz high-shelf filter stable in 16-bit fixed point?
Yes. Rounding the five coefficients to a shared 2.13 scale leaves the largest pole at 0.7089171, against 0.7089119 exact, and the response drifts by at most 0.006 dB inside the band. 24-bit takes that to 0.0000 dB.
Where is the real −3 dB point of a 3.15 kHz high-shelf filter?
3144.5 Hz, which is 0.998× the 3.15 kHz corner. f0 and the −3 dB point are the same frequency only at Q = 1/√2; this page is designed at Q = 0.7071, and a shelf does not read Q at all — its slope is fixed at S = 1, matching Web Audio's BiquadFilterNode, so the gain sweep above is the family that moves this filter rather than a Q sweep.
How close to the unit circle are the poles of a 3.15 kHz high-shelf filter?
0.7089119 at 48 kHz, as a conjugate pair at ±20.54°. Pole radius rises toward 1 as the corner frequency falls relative to the sample rate — the same filter at 192 kHz sits at 0.9170447 and at 8 kHz at 0.6700806. That distance is the whole story of the fixed-point table: a pole a few parts in 10⁵ from the circle has nowhere to be rounded to.
The neighbouring corners
One third-octave either side, and the same 3.15 kHz corner as every other filter type.
- Low-pass3.15 kHz
- High-pass3.15 kHz
- Band-pass3.15 kHz
- Notch3.15 kHz
- All-pass3.15 kHz
- Peaking EQ3.15 kHz
- Low shelf3.15 kHz
Method and limits. Coefficients follow the RBJ Audio EQ Cookbook, the bilinear transform of the analog prototype prewarped so the corner lands exactly on f0 — which is why +3.00 dB at 3.15 kHz holds at every sample rate in the table rather than only at low f0/Fs. Shelves fix the slope at S = 1, matching Web Audio's BiquadFilterNode, so Q is not read for those two types. Pole and zero radii are the roots of the quadratic, not sqrt(|a2|). The fixed-point rows model a single shared coefficient scale and no other quantisation: they say nothing about signal-path headroom, limit cycles or the accumulator width your implementation uses, all of which can make a filter that passes this table still misbehave. Nothing on this page is fetched or estimated — it is solved from the type and the frequency in the URL.